How big can you print from 6 Mega-pixel files?

I was never happy with how my Epson V700 scanned 35mm film. Don´t get me wrong, it is not bad, but in the end it is a massive pain to mount and scan a whole roll of 35mm film. On my search for a new scanner, I came across many suitable solutions from dedicated film scanners to small minilab scanners like a Noritsu LS-600 or the Kodak Pakon F135+. Chatting on Twitter about the benefits of each scanner I decided to go for a Pakon F135. Mike Poulit was kind enough to answer all my Pakon related questions. Finally I could not resist any longer and I ordered a Pakon F135 non-plus version from AAA image solutions in the US.

The Kodak Pakon F135 scanners are available in two versions, the plus and the non-plus version. The major difference is the output resolution and speed. The plus version scans a whole role of film much faster than the non-plus version, the difference in resolution is also significant: The plus version can give you 2000x3000 pixel files, while the non-plus will only scan at 1500x2250 pixel. There is however a nice workaround. Pakon seemed to use the same CCD element for both scanners and with the demo software that is called TLXclient you can utilize the 2000x3000 pixel resolution even with the non-plus version however at the reduced speed.

The Pakon scanners have been distributed under several names and they are also known as Nexlab scanners. The scanner will give you wonderful colors, good quality and fast processing times, if you can live with the drawback of the comparably low resolution files. OK, compared to the modern digital world these resolutions are not state of the art anymore, but how big do we want to go anyway? Can I print those files big enough with good quality to allow nice prints at 12x18 inch size? This is about the size I normally print on my Epson 3880, when I want big files.

Developing, Scanning and Printing

Shipping to Germany was very very fast and after my scanner arrived and it had been set up, I was eager to experiment with it.

I scanned several rolls from my recent Hong Kong trip and was very happy with the look of the black and white files. The film I used on the trip was Kodak TX400 developed in Kodak XTOL 1:1. For the reasons mentioned above I used the TLXclient software and scanned all rolls at 2000x3000ppi. For some fine tuning I went to Lightroom and did some tweaking there: Only very light sharpening, black point adjustment and a small contrast increase. That´s it. A very clean and simple workflow. Now it was time to print the 6 Mega-pixel file and see if I could get away with a 12 x 18 inch print.

This goal was beyond the normally recommended size for a print resolution of 360ppi or even 300ppi. I told Lightroom to slightly upscale the file and this worked very well. The final print was very pleasing with good detail rendering and sufficient sharpness. Even at a very close examination I still could not found any scaling artifacts.

Conclusion

The Pakon files can easily be printed up to a size of 12x18 in thanks to the very nice upscaling algorithms available in the latest Adobe products. I looks like I have found my scanner for all 35mm projects!

See other scans from this series in my previous blog post "Exploring Hong Kong"

INTRODUCTION

What is it that draws photographers to film, despite its somewhat outdated nature? I've written at length on this blog about the tactile, emotional, and aesthetic qualities of analog photography — and I still believe that digital can rarely replace the joy of loading a roll, advancing the film lever, hearing the satisfying shutter sound, and embracing the beautiful uncertainty of results.

Still, digital photography is often more practical. That’s why so many film photographers — myself included — look for tools to emulate the feel of analog film in a digital workflow. Over the years, a number of companies have emerged in this space: Mastin Labs, RNI, The Classic Presets, Dehancer — and now, a new contender: ColorPrecision, developed by film enthusiast and colorist Owen Markham.

Exploring the Floating City with a Canon AE-1

Venice in the fall. The city breathes differently when the summer crowds fade. The soft, diffused light reflects on the water, casting subtle ripples on ancient facades. The damp air carries the scent of salt and history. I arrived with no fixed plan—just my Canon AE-1 and a few rolls of Kodak Vision3, ready to capture whatever unfolded in front of me.

DEHANCER FILM LIGHTROOM PLUGIN REVIEW

A personal take on one of the most popular film emulation tools

This isn’t your typical review! Instead, it’s a report on my hands-on experience with Dehancer Film, breaking down the key aspects of the software. After experimenting with its interface and creating a range of looks, I wanted to see if Dehancer could complement my digital workflow, especially since I primarily shoot analog film.

ColorPrecision Review

A FRESH TAKE ON KODAK FILM EMULATION FOR LIGHTROOM

A SILENT JOURNEY THROUGH VENICE

The Ultimate Way of Digital Film Emulation

No. 24 — A Visual Journey

Introduction On many of my travels, I often seek out architectural gems: small houses that are iconic and stylistically significant but lie off the beaten tourist paths and aren't featured on every influencer's account. One of these significant masterpieces is the Alvar Aalto House in Helsinki, a place where architecture and light form a poetic symbiosis. During my visit, I was impressed by the thoughtful spatial design and the warm, natural lighting. The flowing forms and organic materials tell the story of an architect who masterfully knew how to direct light. To view the rooms undisturbed and in peace, the Alvar Aalto Foundation limits group sizes to a small number of participants. After a very knowledgeable and engaging tour, I had the opportunity to explore and photograph the house on my own. I will elaborate on the specific photographic techniques later, but first, let’s take a brief look at who Alvar Aalto

Camera Scanning Part IV

If, like me, you've been captivated by scanning over the years and simply enjoy digitizing film, it's clear that you follow the market and the countless options available to you. I've written several times about the possibility of building your own small scanner setup. By now, my own setup has changed significantly and what started with a few simple components has grown into a very precise tool. I get a lot of joy from it and can finally scan films the way I want. However, to get this far, I had to overcome several hurdles. But let's start from the beginning.